Skip to content

About Nungesser: The Man Emma Sulkowicz Reported For Rape

October 2, 2014

I already wrote about Emma Sulkowicz.  She reported a man to Columbia University for raping her, but the panel cleared him.  She went to the police, but they treated her poorly and did nothing.  Then she formulated a performance art piece, Carry That Weight, which has been widely covered and has received a great deal of support both within and without the university.

Her parents wrote a letter identifying the man she reported, and shedding significant additional light:  the same man, Jean-Paul Nungesser, was previously adjudicated responsible in an incident of violence sexual assault against a different female student, following her to her room and shoving her inside.  And Emma Sulkowics made her decision to report him after learning from other women about incidents indicating that his behavior was part of a pattern.  Here’s one thing they say:

3) The fact that Nungesser had previously been found “responsible” by a Columbia panel for following another Columbia student to her room, shoving his way in, forcefully pinning, and groping her was not allowed as evidence in Emma’s hearing. Just days before her hearing, Dean Valentini granted an appeal of this verdict, which re-opened the case and consequently disallowed it as evidence. This effectively hamstrung Emma’s case. (An aside: The final hearing for this other case was scheduled and held at a time the complainant had specified that she was not available to testify. Without her presence, the original panel’s “responsible” verdict was easily overturned.)

Much of what they say is about Rosalie Siler, the Columbia minion who acted as Sulkowics’ sole advisor and who, her parents say, essentially hindered rather than helped the presentation of the evidence of Nungesser’s misconduct.  One might suspect, given both that the grant of appeal managed to fortuitously keep the prior conduct out as evidence in Sulkowics’ hearing, and that the University scheduled the new hearing for a time when the complaining witness was unavailable, and that the Sulkowicss allege that Emma was advised not to get her own lawyer (though Nungesser had one) and that her advisor did more to interfere with her case than to present it, that this was an effort to protect Nungesser.

The social dimension of the current political moment is this:  universities are not willing to do much of anything to stop rape, but are willing to put quite a lot of effort into hushing it up, including putting a thumb on the rapist’s side of the scale in their adjudication processes.  That’s what Columbia here stands accused of.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. October 5, 2014 12:13 am

    This was spot on. While I was surfing to read cases like these for my new blogpost, I came across this. It is really sad when we realise the hypocrisy that has become ingrained in our society. You put it simply yet profoundly. Well done 🙂

  2. October 5, 2014 5:55 pm

    Reblogged this on The Order of the White Feather and commented:
    Yet another rape cover-up.
    Surprise, surprise.

  3. October 5, 2014 8:02 pm

    There’s a clear lack of procedural fairness in holding the hearing at a time when the panel knew the complainant could not attend.

  4. Illegalize It permalink
    November 19, 2014 12:31 am

    “The fact that Nungesser had previously been found “responsible” by a Columbia panel for following another Columbia student to her room, shoving his way in, forcefully pinning, and groping her was not allowed as evidence in Emma’s hearing. ”

    That’s not rape but it is against the law and it certainly is sexual assault. Students need to be encouraged to call police asap and forget these shabby college panels. College panels are not the legal system. Even if they find someone “responsible” they still can’t put him behind bars.

Leave a comment