Lubricated Holes and Mangina Attack Dogs: A Glimpse At The MRA Abyss
I don’t exactly frequent MRA websites — “men’s rights activists,” though I suspect almost all my readers know who I’m talking about. But every once in a while I stumble across something and see them, not as they want to be seen by outsiders, but in the spaces where they talk to each other. There’s a latin term lawyers use, res ipsa loquitur: “the thing speaks for itself.” Below are comments left at dub dub dub — I’m not linking them — the (dash) spearhead dot com, in a post from September 20 of this years discussing Christine O’Donnell’s antimasturbation remarks. The post is titled, “they’re afraid of men masturbating.” One thing I want to make clear: these are not aberrant comments in that space. They have a comment rating system. The text of low-rated comments is hidden until clicked. I’m quoting here only comments rated “Well Loved.”
[Trigger warning. After reading, some viewers may get very angry, and stay that way for a long time.]
Bold below is mine.
I think you guys are truely on to something. It is fear of men losing sexual interest of women. Women hate prostitutes, sluts,and foreign women. They especially hate foriegn women simply because of the way men speak of them. Wome have reduce them selves to just pussy and that is it. Listen to any women brag about how strong and independent she is and she will tell you herself she is only good for sex. women are a legal,financial, spiritual or what have you burden on every one they come in contact with. Think about the idea of shaming somebody that is masterbating to come buy this pussy. All for the “right” to take his kids,his house and to say he raped you.
This article is why all MRA’s need to join the tea parties and direct the agenda. They are conservative so we can have a chance at rule of law. They are outside of the ruling elite for now. And if we sit back and talk shit we get what we just read about here today.
On that I disagree, friend. The Tea Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican Party, and the feminist Sarah Palin is their Queen.
Will someone please ask her what she thinks of Democrat-sponsored attempts to prevent American men from traveling abroad to find wives?
There really is no fucking hope for men, is there?
We vote Democrat, we get the feminists and their mangina attack dogs. We vote Republican, we get the feminists and their mangina attack dogs. We vote for the Green Party, we get the feminists and their mangina attack dogs.
And now, if we vote for the Tea Party we get the feminists and their mangina attack dogs.
God help us all!!
Basically a walking talking lubricated hole. Congratulations girls, that is how you are viewed, and only you can change it.
They are starting to see the ramifications that often come from knocking up some toilet of a woman. It’s fun, but boy do you end up paying, either for the “accidental” pregnancy, the STD, and the emotional terrorism. Men need to protect themselves against predators, and don’t be fooled into thinking that there aren’t that many out there; that’s what “female empowerment” has created, and a lot more buy into that than not.
And that’s what we’re really talking about here. Masturbation shaming in the western femocracies. This stupid broad asks “What am I good for if he can pleasure himself?” Obvious answer is that you should help him do it.
I wonder if a single woman realizes that if she gave up her power and came home, she would live an even more privileged life than she does now?
I wonder if a single man realizes that if he treated women as men, they would all give up their power, come back home, and do as they were asked?
Reminds me of the line from The Color of Money, where Tom Cruise’s girlfriend threatens him with:
“You win one more game, you’re gonna be humping your fist for a long time. Got that, Vincent?”
Of course he obeyed her and let her win the next game.
I never understood why. I mean, is her vagina meant to be that far above a “fist” that it can be used to manipulate a man?
This is something I’ve thought about a lot, and it explains a great deal about the character of girls by and large today. If they have nothing to offer but sex, they’ll become obsessed with the value of that sex and impressing it on you. (This is also why ladies of late so frequently resort to “You can’t get laid”/”You’re just not ‘getting any’” as the go-to insult in any argument.) Few women offer an engaging friendship; fewer still a spiritually satisfying companionship (in fact I can think of none, at least in my few years on Earth.) Charges that game is dehumanizing just totally crack me up: I mean, what else am I supposed to judge these women on? They don’t give a crap about anything besides what’s between their legs, so why should I?
A little something: Is not about sexual control or whatever, is the whole fucking system designed to dupe a man in the deathtrap called Marriage 2.0 with an used-up cunt just for bleeding him dry.
Notice how O’Donnell’s statement (“If he already knows what pleases him, and he can please himself, then why am I in the picture?”) frames masturbation in regards to it’s effect on the woman. Just like everything else feminist: another woman twisting it around to make it all about her. She’s probably right – any woman with an attitude like that probably just lies there like a dead fish during sex anyways, so why is she in the picture?
Great article. And a sign of just how low and despicable women have become in this country.
Attention to all men-
“Conservative” women are not your friend. That is a lesson you can take from the story above. A wise man in the MRA blogosphere (I don’t remember who) said once that the main differences between conservative women and liberal women are 1. Abortion and 2. Debates over the best methods to enslave men. I don’t even know if Abortion is the #1 issue anymore, considering most “Conservative Establishment” women are pro-choice.
If women think that masturbation is wrong, then I take it as proof positive that masturbation is the best way to go.
Trust the feminists to always promote things that are bad for men and to put to shame that which is good for men.
Viewing things that way allow you to find the best route for you: what they say is bad for you is, in reality, good for you and vice-versa.
This is a good way to use feminism for your own benefit.
War is deception…
Great point. Apparently, women are unwilling or unable to provide any other value to a man other than a penis-massaging device. Therefore, other penis-massaging devices are “the enemy” in their mind. And these pathetic lowlifes are supposed to be “strong and independent?” Give me a break.
Okay here is the deal. Pussy is easy to get.
Women open their legs for dinner these days. If you enter into a relationship with them afterwards the day will come when the other guys you entered into the relationship will be introduced. These guys were suits and ties, costumes and badges, and some even wear your clothes, sleep in your bed, and have sex with your wife.
NAWALT doesn’t mean shit, when any NAWALT can have a bad and call the cops. That is when men learn about the unseen part of their relationship with the vaginal carrier.
Until the third party exits the relationship more and more men will wake up, including the violent ones, and when the good ones don’t care, you ladies will be left in their harems.
See, the problem is that it is impossible to tell “the sluts” apart from any other woman. A lot of the sluts also tend to say that they aren’t like that, but big surprise!… Look at those paternity testing statistics for how often men aren’t the father.
It’s the same reason men are wary of marriage. You can’t tell whether a woman is going to just decide to send you to the poor house later on down the road by taking your home, money, and then getting a bunch of monthly payments from you.
For a feminist, any expression of male sexuality is a bad thing. The idea of rape culture is based on this premise. Men use sex to control women where sex becomes defined as rape. Therefore male sexuality must be condemned and controlled. since masturbation is a expression of male sexuality, that must be condemned and controlled as well.
Thag, the problem is that 99% of “intellectual” women are hardened Leftist
Feminists. They use whatever brainpower they have to directly or indirectly facilitate female supremacy.
Due to this, I have declared my expectations of a woman to be “for fun & for fucking.” I believe it to be an advantageous position in today’s society.
I’d rather masturbate than get involved with an unstable woman. And I’m the classic beta. A guy who has gained financial stability, can afford to support a family on my own yet does not date and is pretty much isolated from the dating scene. A guy who looks around and sees what’s happening, repeatedly told I’m a loser and I NEED TO CHANGE BECAUSE SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH ME. No, something is wrong with the slut culture.
Whether it’s to be done by women, or by the state, hopeless “pussy-beggars” are simply more easily controlled than are men who take charge over any and all aspects of their lives.
Many women (subconsciously) realize that they bring very little value to the relationship other than sex. It is akin to a wealthy man who lavishes gifts on a girl to get her into bed. Women use their pussy (at least in the initial phase of the relationship) to artificially create a bond (and get the guy to commit)… This is why many women fear male sexual independence, because they realize that other than sex, they can not a mate, because they have no other value. In addition, this is why men should never start a relationship in the “provider” role, as you should be secure enough in your value to not resort to bribes.
Women know where their powerbase lies. So long as men where willing to kowtow for sex, they ‘had us’ in additional to the power they have acquired politically. However, the more alternatives men have to sex, the lower men’s tolerance to women’s unreasonable and demanding behavior. Women know this, and this is the main reason why any alternative is a legitimate threat to a woman’s stranglehold on men and therefore their resources.
Empowering women to have unbridled sex through lowered moral standards and birth control, has reduced the vagina to a commodity product.
They’ve been slowly losing their allure over the last 40 years. It’s so common and easy to come by that it has lost it’s “specialness”. It’s everywhere and its free. Gone is female modesty and restraint. The porn star is idolized.
Any “celebration” of male sexuality by feminists is only in as much as it can be exploited, i.e. controlled. I’m sure you might find a handful of exceptions, but certainly this is not the case in general. The successes of the feminist movement have been based on the concept “men=evil/women=good” and male sexuality is the primary source of evil.
A married woman does not stop trying to catch the eye of other men. This isn’t harmless fun. This is, when you get down to it, sick shit. Men have the emotional desire to love and to be loved; women have these emotional desires too, but they also have the burning need to be loved by men whom they do not love. We’re not talking about backup plans in case their husbands ditch them. We’re talking about men they want nothing to do with, but still demand that they be desired by them.
They become furious when they do not have this. One woman is enough for a man; one man is never enough for a woman, even if she is chaste and only romantically involved with him. She will want more men to be chasing her, and she never intends to reciprocate. Fury is the result when she does not have this.
In a previous post, you said that women are going their own way.
Maybe. And if so, it’s a good thing.
But WHY DON’T YOU GO YOUR OWN WAY???
Why do you keep on posting here?
Can’t you see you’re NOT WANTED HERE?
Nobody, repeat: NOBODY cares about you.
Be a fly on the wall if you can’t help but listen but PLEASE quit posting.
I hate it when there’s a speck of shit in my dish.
Feminism is all about female sexuality and its gratification. The permission to flaunt it in order to satisfy the female ego; and to do so without any repercussions or being subjected to advances from men lower on the hierarchy; the ability to go for the best men and not to be called sluts even after taking a mutlitude of cocks in different orifices; wearing rags that leave their asses and bosoms hanging out, but “hey don’t objectify me bro”.
On “sex positive” feminists-
To be fair, it is very true that some fems celebrate male sexuality. Young women seem to have a different attitude on some male sexuality than their older, more militant counterparts. However, their refreshing tolerance comes to a screeching halt when it comes to things like foreign brides, sex robots, or prostitution.
A young feminist will watch porn with you, go to a strip club with you, and buy you a “fleshlight.” What she will never do is tolerate a long-term replacement strategy for her company.
Women aren’t interested in ‘quality men’ at the moment due to the fact that even if they choose poorly, their needs are taken care of by and through the government. Understand, in the past making a good and educated choice in a mate was a very important matter for women, there was no social assistance or alimony so essentially, there where no other choices. As a woman, you chose well, and you chose as early as you could before your appearance dwindled and compromised your choices and there was no one to come to your rescue if you screwed things up.
Their little feminism experiment to give less and less to men and to demand more and more of them has not ended with the better bigger deal they wanted. It has ended with men concluding that women are a bad deal and leaving them alone. They have priced out of the marked.
Now they are bewildered. They don’t know what to do. Let’s forbid porn, let’s forbid masturbation, let’s forbid prostitution, let’s forbid videogames (not yet but I don’t think it is impossible in the future). Let’s forbid anything different than being a woman’s slave.
They are delusional. Nothing will work. The only thing that would work is to give a better deal to men. But they are not interested in that. In their magical thinking world, they think that they can make men love them only by forbidding things and shaming them.
Haha. They have what they deserve. After millenia of being supported and adored by men (who often died by them), they decided to bite the hand who feeds them. Now, enjoy the world you have created.
btw, I notice that a lot of females here think the clitoris is what makes a female orgasm. You hear all of this feminist propaganda about how superior the clitoris is to the penis blah blah blah but if that were so than all females would have orgasm every time they had sex. Few do.The females who can orgasm like deep penetration. Feminists like the clit idea because most of them are lesbians but it’s funny because even lesbians resort to dildoes, sometimes double headed ones so the instinct to be penetrated must be deep rooted when even man hating dykes want something in them.
Re: A women’s body being her own.
Yes, it is, until she stands up at an alter in front of witnesses and she vows to “combine my body and soul as one with my spouse until death do us part”, then it seems a bit of an encumbrance attaches. If she wants to re-assert unilateral atonomy over her body, I guess that would be a repudiation of her marriage vows, freeing her husband of his maritial obligations.
Women can be replaced for OUR needs. Yes, us guys need women if we want to have babies…..however…..who wants to have those babies….oh yeah, that’s right…THEY DO. WE can live without them, get it? See how this situation begins to really undermine a woman’s interest’s long term? How much wealth does the Black Community produce in comparison to other communities? How successful is the Black Community as a whole? All one has to do is imagine the whole country resembling the black community and that should go a far way in quelling some doubts about the longevity of The Gynocracy. Hanna Rosin is only right about the end of men if men continue to get married and produce, which men aren’t.
F*ck the tolerance. Feminists have all the mass media (radio, TV, press) and ten websites for each MRA website. They have the control of most Universities and great influence about politics and marketing. And they don’t have the slightest tolerance for dissenting voices.
What do we have? A handful of minority websites, viewed only by a handful of men who are surrounded by manginas and white knights. They cannot speak about their ideas even with their most intimate friends and family, lest they are stigmatized. They come to these few websites to vent.
I could discuss the themes — the hate, the resentment, the women-as-deceivers trope, the Commodity Model, the references to foreign brides, the poor spelling, grammar, and logic. I’ll leave all that to others. I’ll just let this stand as a look into that abyss.